Does number of implants or type of attachment affect patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures?

  • S. Kucukkurt | skucukkurt@gmail.com Assistant Professor, Istanbul Aydın University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey.
  • H. C. Tükel Assistant Professor, Çukurova University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Adana, Turkey, Turkey.

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to determine, from the patients’ perspective, the optimal number of implants and the type of attachment used to support a mandibular overdenture.

Materials and methods This study was conducted with 166 patients who had received new implant-retained overdentures (IODs) in the mandible and conventional total prostheses in the maxilla, and have been using for at least 1-year. Three types of attachment (ball attachment, bar holder, and locator) were connected to either two or four implants. Patients completed the OHIP–14 questionnaire, and the results were statistically analyzed.

Results Patients were, in general, satisfied with their mandibular IODs (OHIP-ADD: 7.07 ±9.09, OHIP-SC: 0.95 ±2.11). While the satisfaction rate was higher for males (P < 0.05), there was no difference for age factor (P > 0.05). Higher satisfaction was observed for 4-implant support (P = 0.014), especially with bar holders (OHIP-SC: 0.13 ±0.43). No difference was found between the locator and ball attachment in prostheses with 2-implant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion Four implant-support, in particular, with bar-holders, exhibited higher satisfaction. There was no difference between locator and ball attachment in terms of patient satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-01-17
Section
Articles
Keywords
Ball attachment, Bar holder, Dental implant number, Implant-supported denture, Locator
Statistics
Abstract views: 48

pdf: 43
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Kucukkurt, S., & Tükel, H. (2020). Does number of implants or type of attachment affect patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures?. Journal of Osseointegration. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2020.12.01.04