Literature on the accuracy of guided surgery for dental implants: A scoping review

Published: 21 September 2021
Abstract Views: 633
pdf: 1060
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Aim To summarise data available in the PubMed database regarding the accuracy of dental implants placed by means of static and navigated guided surgery.

Methods A search strategy was performed in order to find eligible articles in English reporting the accuracy of dental implants placed in humans with guided surgery techniques.

Results The search resulted in 387 articles for screening. After the selection, 44 articles were included for data extraction. 22 articles reported the accuracy of static guided surgery with mucosa-supported guides, 20 with tooth-supported, 3 with bone-supported and 7 with dynamic guided surgery.

Conclusions All studies with Static Guided Surgery and Dynamic Guided Surgery included in this review present deviations within the clinical accepted limits and represent excellent alternatives for guided implant placement.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Gerhardt, M. N., Kreuzer, K. B., & Shinkai, R. S. A. (2021). Literature on the accuracy of guided surgery for dental implants: A scoping review. Journal of Osseointegration, 13(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.5

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.