Facial gingival level evaluation with and without connective tissue graft using tunnel technique on single immediate implants in the esthetic zone: A randomized controlled clinical trial


Submitted: 4 May 2021
Accepted: 15 June 2021
Published: 9 December 2021
Abstract Views: 978
pdf: 374
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • P.M. Abdelsamie MSC, PhD Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt - Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, MTI University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • A. E. Elarab Periodontology department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • R.O. Ibrahim Periodontology department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • A.R.A. Rahman Periodontology department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Aim The current study aimed to compare between immediate dental implants alone versus combined immediate dental implants with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the esthetic zone, and also to assess whether soft tissues augmentation could be an innovative option for reducing facial soft tissue recession.

Materials and methods In this parallel-designed RCT, a total of 18 participants were treated with single immediate post-extraction implants with SCTG placed using tunnel technique in the anterior and premolar areas (study group) and immediate implants treated without raising a flap and without SCTG (control group). Patients were observed with clinical parameters at baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-ups after implant placement. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA test to test the mean differences of the data that follow normal distribution and with repeated measures (between groups, within groups and overall difference).

Results After 6 months, facial gingival level changes were 3.72 mm ± 0.9 for the control group and 3.06 mm ± 0.9 for the study group, where the mean difference was 0.66 mm (95% CI, -0.53 to 1.85; P= 0.245). Regarding overall percentage change from baseline to 6 months, statistically significant differences were found between control group (25.17 ± 8.2) and study group (4.93 ± 0.2), mean difference was 20.63 (95% CI, 0.40 to 40.86; P= 0.054).

Conclusions With careful patient selection, the facial gingival level can be maintained after connective tissue grafting with single immediate implant placement.


Abdelsamie, P., Elarab, A. E., Ibrahim, R., & Rahman, A. (2021). Facial gingival level evaluation with and without connective tissue graft using tunnel technique on single immediate implants in the esthetic zone: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Osseointegration, 14(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2022.14.11

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations