The outcome of tilted distal implants immediately loaded under screw-retained cross-arch prostheses. A 5-year retrospective cohort study


Submitted: 30 August 2023
Accepted: 5 January 2024
Published: 5 March 2024
Abstract Views: 79
PDF: 143
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Aim The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of tilted distal implants immediately loaded with metal-resin screw-retained cross-arch fixed prostheses 5 years after loading.
Material and Methods One-hundred-seventy-six consecutive patients received four to six implants to be placed with a torque superior 35 Ncm. Two-hundred-nineteen metal-resin screwretained fixed prostheses (120 mandibular and 98 maxillary) were to be delivered within 3 days. Implant failures and biological complications were evaluated by the treating clinician.
Results A total of 922 implants were placed, 407 of which were tilted distal implants. Two patients dropped-out (died). Five years after loading all patients were wearing fixed prostheses. Ten tilted distal implants failed in 9 (5.17%) patients versus six non-distal implants in five patients (2.87%). Fifty-one biological complications occurred at tilted distal implants in 42 patients (24.14%) versus 37 complications occurred at non-distal implants in 24 patients (13.79%).
Conclusions In conclusion, tilted distal implants have a double chance of failing or having biological complications when compared to mesial implants.


Giordano, F., Di Spirito, F., Acerra, A., Rupe, A., Cirigliano, G., & Caggiano, M. (2024). The outcome of tilted distal implants immediately loaded under screw-retained cross-arch prostheses. A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Journal of Osseointegration, 16(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2024.601

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations