Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor). While the manuscript is undergoing the peer review phase, the authors will not submit the manuscript to another journal without notifying the editor.
  • The submission file is in Microsoft Word or PDF document file format.
  • We fight plagiarism: please understand that your article will be checked with available tools for discovering plagiarism.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  • Please read this advice and download all associated files. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has recently published in all ICMJE journals an editorial introducing a new “Disclosure Form for Potential Conflict of Interest”, with the aim to establish uniform reporting system, which can go over the existing differences in current formats or editors’ requests. We at Ariesdue welcome this initiative as a possible uniforming, standardizing way to have this important disclosure authorizing the publications of manuscripts. We are therefore asking you to duly fill in the “Uniform Format for Disclosure of Competing Interests in ICMJE Journals” and upload it on the Web site of the journal your work is involved with or email it back to us, in mind to allow Ariesdue to peer-reviewing your work. The document is in Adobe format, it includes instructions to help authors provide the requested information and the completion procedure is user-friendly. Kindly note that the format have to be completed and signed by each author of the work. We remain waiting for the completed form to proceed with publication. Please be informed that if this Disclosure Form is missing, we will not be able to publish your work.

Author Guidelines

To submit a new paper to our journal:

  1. Register as an Author; we encourage you to register also as a Reader and a Reviewer at the same time;
  2. Read and follow the Guidelines for Authors;
  3. Read our Editorial Policies and our Competing Interest policies.


To submit a revised version:

  1. Log in;
  2. Click on your role as Author;
  3. Click on IN REVIEW: REVISIONS REQUIRED or RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW on the page displayed (under the heading ‘Status’, near the manuscript title);
  4. Under the heading EDITOR DECISION, upload your revised paper as AUTHOR VERSION using Browse and Upload buttons;
  5. Use the NOTIFY EDITOR e-mail button to inform the Editors that the revised version has been submitted. 


Article Submission

Authors must state that their manuscript is not being considered for publication in another journal. Copies of a permission to reproduce material that has been published elsewhere, or to use illustrations that may enable readers to identify subjects or individuals, should be included.

As an option, we offer a dedicated professional copyediting service.
Professional copyediting can help authors improve the presentation of their work and increase its chances of being taken on by a publisher. In case you feel that your manuscript needs a professional English language copyediting checking language grammar and style, you can find a reliable revision service at:

Manuscript length

Papers submitted to the Journal of Osseointegration must be in English language, typed in a 12-point font and double-spaced; they should not exceed 20 typescript pages (including the title page), plus a typical number of figures (about 10 to 15). Italian authors must also supply an Italian translation of the full text.

Title page

Provide the following data on the title page (in the order given): title, author names, titles and affiliations (where the work was actually done), corresponding author (telephone and fax numbers, with country and area code, e-mail and complete postal address).

Abstract

Abstracts must not exceed 250 words and should be structured as follows: Aim, Materials and methods, Results, and Conclusions.

Keywords

Authors should list 4 to 6 keywords that appropriately represent the contents of the work.

Headings

The component parts of the main text of a manuscript will normally be Introduction, Materials and methods, Results, and Discussion. Other parts of the manuscript will normally include a list of references, tables, figure legends, and figures.

References

References should be listed according to the Vancouver style of referencing, that is numbered in sequence as they are cited in the text. They should be also included on a separate page in the manuscript. Examples for arranging the reference list. Journals Mangano C, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:980-6. Monographs Matthews DE, Farewell VT. Using and understanding medical statistics. Basel: Karger; 1985. Edited books Piattelli A, Misch CE, Farias Pontes AE, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Degidi M. Dental Implant surfaces: a review. In: Carl E. Misch. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Third edition. Mosby Elsevier 2008:599-620.Authors will be responsible for the accuracy of the references both within the main text and the reference list.

Tables and figures

Each table should be typed on a separate page at the end of the manuscript, and numbered consecutively. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in tables do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article. Figures, charts, and graphs should be professionally drawn. Text should be large enough to be read after reduction. Resolution must be at least 300 dpi when the image is 3 inches wide. Files saved in TIFF or JPEG format are preferred. Please do not send images embedded in word processing programs (eg, Word) or “office suite” programs (Excel, PowerPoint, etc). Figure legends should be typed as a group on a separate page at the end of the manuscript. There should be an individual legend for each illustration. Detailed captions are encouraged. For microphotographs, specify original magnification and stain.

 

Informed Consent and Privacy

Our journals strictly follows the ICMJE Protection of Research Participants policy detailed at http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/protection-of-research-participants.html

Patients have a right to privacy that should not be violated without informed consent. When informed consent has been obtained, editors may request authors to provide a copy before making the editorial decision.

Manuscripts must be reviewed with due respect for authors' confidentiality. In submitting their manuscripts for review, authors entrust editors with the results of their scientific work and creative effort, on which their reputation and career may depend. Authors' rights may be violated by disclosure of the confidential details during review of their manuscript. Reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which must be respected by the editor. Confidentiality may have to be breached if dishonesty or fraud is alleged but otherwise must be honored.

Editors must not disclose information about manuscripts (including their receipt, content, status in the reviewing process, criticism by reviewers, or ultimate fate) to anyone other than the authors and reviewers. This includes requests to use the materials for legal proceedings.

Protection of Human Subjects and Animals in Research

When reporting experiments on human subjects, authors should indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. Documented review and approval from a formally constituted review board (Institutional Review Board - IRB - or Ethics committee) is required for all studies (prospective or retrospective) involving people, medical records, and human tissues. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should certificate that the institutional and national guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.