the Simultaneous sinus lift and implant placement using lateral approach in atrophic posterior maxilla with residual bone height of 5 mm or less. A systematic review


Published: 6 September 2019
Abstract Views: 992
pdf: 1071
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Aim To test both success and survival rate of implant placed simultaneously with sinus lift in atro-phic posterior maxilla with a residual bone height of less than 5 mm.

Materials and methods A computer search strategy was developed for the following electronic databases: MEDLINE/ PubMed and EMBASE. All the relevant articles were screened involving controlled  clinical trials, randomized clinical trials, prospective cohort studies. 

Results The selection process yielded  12  studies, published  between 1999 and 2016, 6 of which were  prospective, 1 was a randomized controlled trial, 5 were controlled studies.

Conclusions Within the limitation of this systematic review, the qualitative data analysis revealed that the survival rate of implants placed in grafted sinus ranged from 61% to 100%; on the other hand, the success rate ranged between 75.3% to 94.8%. No significant differences were detected regarding different grafting materials used. In order to understand if the one-stage pro-cedure is an effective and predictable surgical alternative in critically resorbed maxillae, larger and well designed clinical trials are needed.


Ethics Approval

survival rate of implant inserted in critically resorbed maxilla

d’Elia, C., Baldini, N., Gabriele, G., Nuti, N., Juloski, J., & Gennaro, P. (2019). the Simultaneous sinus lift and implant placement using lateral approach in atrophic posterior maxilla with residual bone height of 5 mm or less. A systematic review. Journal of Osseointegration, 11(4), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations